Reading my good friend Paul Hoffman's new book on the world of competitive chess got me to thinking: about music, community, competition, and what music says about who we are as a society.
I came to music through rock and jazz searching for community. I doubt that’s unique in any way; whether its the shared community of a gospel choir, a jazz band, the civic orchestra, or the Sunday afternoon concerts of John Philip Sousa music performed in the park by the veterans of foreign wars band I vaguely remember from my childhood, we all come together to break metaphorical bread at a shared musical table. We may speak different languages but if we share the language of music we can communicate.
Some languages are easy to learn, some difficult and nuanced, but all inherently embody that duality between initiate and outcast. We form our tribes and construct our musical languages out of shared values—about community, complexity, and competition. The language of rock and roll sublimated complexity to community—a language fashioned out of three-chord jams and eight-bar blues allowed the counter-culture of the 1960s and ‘70s to turn the established social and political structures of western music on its head. “Let a thousand garage bands bloom,” Mao was heard to say.
***
I came to gamelan music through sound but found community. I was captivated the first time I heard recordings of gamelan, and hooked after attending my first performance. One did not need to understand the musical language to become enthralled by that enrapturing sound captured on Bob Brown’s seminal Nonesuch Explorer recordings released in the late ‘60s—like someone hearing the sound of a foreign tongue and becoming so intrigued that they decide at once to learn the language, I simply had to know more.
In Javanese gamelan music I also found a social text that could only have emerged from a society that valued obtuse and artful articulation, studied restraint, and sublimation of the idea of individual expression in service of communal cohesion. If rock and jazz were all about expression, gamelan was about understated nuance, a “cultured” expression of baroque excesses favored by a mystical, idiosyncratic court—the hierarchal power relationships of Javanese language manifested in music.
Jazz exerted an altogether different allure. Whereas western classical music seemed too constrained by its own social and musical conventions, and rock too lost in narcissistic expression, jazz held out the promise of a music that married both Eros and Logos, community and complexity, spontaneous expression and studied artistry... and theatricality (cf., Art Ensemble of Chicago).
Jazz had another side to it though, a competitive side. One could find its roots in the playful challenges and musical repartee that two gifted soloists might partake in on the bandstand, or the gentle boasting one might hear after a gig, a gendered language that shared more vocabulary with boxing than letters: Sonny Rollins delivered a “knock-out” solo, Miles a “stinging” rebuke, a pull-out-all-the-punches artistry. Jazz is a music that could have only emerged out of the struggles of a people caught in the vortex of market capitalism American-style in the first half of the 20th Century.
***
I came to opera later in life. My only problem with opera was that damn singing. I've learned that I'm not alone in my reaction: the fastest way I know to empty a room is the sound of a wobbly mezzo. Opera is an acquired taste. Like fine wine, perhaps more so, since the search for that "perfect" performance, that rare alignment of singer to a role, a composer, and a director sublimely suited for each other is the most ephemeral.
Opera aficionados pride themselves on their exclusivity, and a sense of competition. They cultivate it. Nonetheless, opera, perhaps more than any other genre, save jazz, thrives because of community. A community of celebrated feats and shared memories—that Meistersinger at Bayreuth in 1952 or that La Fille du Regiment at the Met in ‘72.
The opera community is altogether different from the shared community I found with gamelan. It is a community of spectators, a community that says we celebrate these performers because they are different from you and me. They are endowed with abilities we will never possess; we marvel at them; we place them on a proscenium stage not a pendopo, and we hang on every breath, fascinated with that fear of failure as they reach for the high notes, aerialists performing without a net.
When I first became interested in opera, I asked a friend why he
went. He said because for every thirty-five mediocre performances he
had attended there was one that changed his life. I thought that for
life-changing experiences those were pretty good odds.